HOME   |   COMMUNITY   |   TRAINING   |   BATTLES   |   DUELS   |   CAMPAIGNS   |   HELP      
Click above links for MAIN menus, mouse-over for sub-menus.27 NOV 2024 17:40  
ShoutBox
PLEASE VOTE at
MPOGD & TWG

WoL Membership

SiteMap



free counters

W
A
R
O
N
L
I
N
E
:

M
E
S
S
A
G
E

B
O
A
R
D

R
E
P
L
I
E
S
Who's Online : 0 (6)
Active : 11 (12)

refresh
Back To Forum Games   |   Return To Forums
Forum : Forum Games
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31   >>
AuthorTopic : Gangs of New Wol Game Thread
darkguy00000
Joined 11/04/2006
Posts : 1009

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 05:06

Good on Corflu for having such descriptive evidece. 'Tis true I don't take a stance on many things; I haven't for ages (since Game 2) and since it keeps me alive I haven't stopped (especially since in Game 1 I was lynched after Biscuit, whose argument I supported, got nightkilled :S).

As for a self-proclaimed veteran: the definition of veteran fits neatly on my case; true I haven't actually been a key part of the winning games but I've always been present .

As for me not voting, that's mainly due to time differences. Most people play whilst I'm fast asleep and usually by then the lynches have been decided while I'm still unsure.

As for being very undecisive that's just me. I'm always torn because obviously getting caught out supporting a mafia (unknowingly, of course) is a very vulnerable position, and I don't want to get stuck in that position. The practical upshot of this is that I appear extremely uncertain (which, you could argue, I am).

A secondary reason, especially in later game (which you say I am more suspicious in, I really wouldn't know) is because I know that a single mislynch and we need to get them all right. With four people and a tangled web of innocence and just townie "ignorance" (not being disrepectful but in this context means "unknowing of the actual facts"), and with the townies seeming to be connived every second game I want to win one for once .

Every time the townies win I end up dead .

PS. Coopels is right, although your analysis is a welcome change from "I reckon _______ did it" it could be flawed due to human bias. Still extremely informative and helpful though.

Sage DoC
Joined 8/11/2002
Posts : 4070

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 12:04

*ghost sage*

Sad I died...all this manipulating looks like so much fun.

Nebuchadnezer DoC
Joined 9/06/2005
Posts : 3017

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 12:42

*Neb slaps the ghost Sage, and asks him to please keep quiet!

Corflu
Joined 22/08/2003
Posts : 1408

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 18:40

Well, darkguy. Guess it's up to you and me. Coopels is looking to save himself and has latched onto Geuritol. Geuritol gives absolutely zero reasons but votes for me. I still think it is because I said he did not post much early on.

I don't think it is Gueritol, and I have not changed my "posting". I was sick and was going to be gone for a while and think it important that with just 4 to go we all have our thoughts out there.

I am voting for Coopels. Coop, Biscuit DID acuse you and I see a lot of changes in what you are trying to say now by retracting it. For some reason Gueritol is blind, though I am not. You get my vote. The facts point clearly at you, which is why it look sthat way!

Coopels DoC
Joined 29/01/2005
Posts : 1037

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 19:42

As i said before all of your "facts" are just uses of past postings and the twisting of their meanings by omitting certain things. I can''t find a specific post from Biscuit that says i am mafia. Certainly he suspected me, but who didn''t, I made a lot of poor choices in this game. I didn''t have much suspicion of you until you posted that huge analysis that was full of misrepresentations and false leadings. Until then i had thought it could have been anyone.

Corflu
Joined 22/08/2003
Posts : 1408

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 19:47

Coopels, your convenient memory could be aided by reading back a little. Biscuit thought it was Chunky, Coopels, or Corflu. It''s not Chunky and it''s not me. That leaves you as someone he clearly named and suspected.

Corflu
Joined 22/08/2003
Posts : 1408

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 19:49

If you watch what I have done all game long, is to look at the facts of what was said by whom to whom. I did it here at length because it is important. If it''s not you, it can only be one other to me.

Coopels DoC
Joined 29/01/2005
Posts : 1037

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 19:55

Convenient memory indeed. I know Biscuit had said it was either chunky, Corflu and me, but later on he did post this:

"Logic 1:

Then I also re-read Wasteland''s posts. He was very quick to start accusing people after each new day started. This quote I took out from one of his posts:
"I was thinking either Coop or Bud, but want to hear everyone else''s thoughts."
There are other posts where he continued to finger these two. We now know that Bud was townie, and unless it is a very twisted mafia plan (only Sage might have done this), I beginning to suspect that Coopels is also townie. Which really leaves me thinking then that it is either Chunky or Corflu.

Logic 2:

I really dislike inactives in this game and feel they should be mod-killed right away, so the townies don''t have to do it. But again, usually mafia are active in posting, if only to misdirect the lynchings. So if mafia are usually active and chunky isn''t (not even voting) then it''s not likely that chunky is mafia, leaving Coopels and Corflu as the two suspects."

So Biscuit never acused me of being mafia, he only suspected me as he also suspected you. Don''t try to misrepresent Biscuit''s last statements with your own twist.

Coopels DoC
Joined 29/01/2005
Posts : 1037

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 19:56

Sorry, that was Biscuit''s second to last post with his last post throwing support against either mafia chunky or inactive chunky as he turned out to be.

Corflu
Joined 22/08/2003
Posts : 1408

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 20:04

Perhaps you misread or have to define the word "acuse". I know Biscuit well enough to know that when he says "....leaving Coopels and Corflu as the two suspects" (after Chunky) he is acusing. Suspecting = acusing. He is non-wavering in that.

Corflu
Joined 22/08/2003
Posts : 1408

Posted : Monday, 26 February 2007 - 20:05

You note you made a lot of poor choices in the game. Which is what I pointed out which is why I suspect you and listed it. It''s nice talk to get out, but I still rely on Neb and Biscuits hunches. And I still put it to you, if not you, then who??

Coopels DoC
Joined 29/01/2005
Posts : 1037

Posted : Tuesday, 27 February 2007 - 01:56

Beats me. This seems like a two person final day that should include 4...

darkguy00000
Joined 11/04/2006
Posts : 1009

Posted : Tuesday, 27 February 2007 - 04:59

Well I can''t see anything to say that''s constructive (until now, at least) to say.

Corflu
Joined 22/08/2003
Posts : 1408

Posted : Tuesday, 27 February 2007 - 06:29

Coopels: DOn''t see what your statement means.

darkguy: seems all to happy with still saying nothing. hmmm, could it be?

Coopels DoC
Joined 29/01/2005
Posts : 1037

Posted : Tuesday, 27 February 2007 - 12:21

i was saying Corflu that it only seems like me and you are still playing.

Dark, now is not the time to be quiet. At this point you should have something to say and if you don''t then why do you even bother playing this game.

Corflu
Joined 22/08/2003
Posts : 1408

Posted : Tuesday, 27 February 2007 - 16:51

I agree with you there, Coopels. Mafia or not, do you want to play? Maybe if not you it is he.

darkguy00000
Joined 11/04/2006
Posts : 1009

Posted : Wednesday, 28 February 2007 - 01:00

Well I think that it is pointless for me to come here and make a "filler" post with no substance.

While I''m here, I might as well point out that you are accusing me due to inactivity yet simply let Gueritol slide? That makes no sense.

Now I''d post something useful but I have to go now. Urgent. Apparently. Ah well.

Corflu
Joined 22/08/2003
Posts : 1408

Posted : Wednesday, 28 February 2007 - 10:51

darkguy, nothing you have said all game long has any substance. And at the slightest inkling of being suspicious for that you acuse Geuritol. And in 24 hours have time to post briefly and run? ya. Right or wrong I am changing my vote to darkguy..

gueritol
Joined 7/02/2003
Posts : 3940

Posted : Wednesday, 28 February 2007 - 13:19

Well let''s band with Corflu ... for good or for bad.

The other alternative ... is a lot of you say I say ... and we all know where that leads.

So after this we''ll know who is the bigger game lier of WOL.

darkguy00000
Joined 11/04/2006
Posts : 1009

Posted : Wednesday, 28 February 2007 - 15:34

Meh. Lynch me. I probably deserve it.

<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31   >>
Back To Forum Games   |   Return To Forums


WarOnline.Net is © Copyright 2000-2024 by Requiem. All rights reserved. [ 0.105469 seconds ] Privacy   |   Terms   |   Links   |   Stats   |   SiteMap