sugarleo Joined 4/05/2002 Posts : 3773
| Posted : Thursday, 7 April 2011 - 06:52 My understanding of the 'end game' option is that when 2-3 players remain and all vote to 'end game'...the game will end with current standings. Evidently, two other players and I have attempted to use this option and it appears the voting is not being accepted or registered....anybody else had this problem?? |
sugarleo Joined 4/05/2002 Posts : 3773
| Posted : Thursday, 7 April 2011 - 20:49 Yep, I know that's how it's supposed to work...this game has all three players saying they've voted (me being one of the three) but the game didn't end. One of the three also promised to not attack another, until we could determine if there was some type of problem...he attacked anyway...so perhaps if one lies about one thing they'll also lie about another.
|
sugarleo Joined 4/05/2002 Posts : 3773
| Posted : Friday, 8 April 2011 - 17:16 Wow...I shoulda thought of that. j/k Last Edited : Friday, 8 April 2011 - 17:18 | Trotsky Joined 13/07/2009 Posts : 254
| Posted : Saturday, 9 April 2011 - 10:59 Any luck on the game closing ? | | Zandorr Joined 4/03/2009 Posts : 40
| Posted : Saturday, 9 April 2011 - 11:32 I have voted to end every turn and have always kept promises but having been ganged up on by henry and leo I just quit this ends the problem for me appearently my treaty With Henry was written in disapearing ink and what I told sugar is that I would not KEEP attacking We have had an equal # of attacking turns my last attack was before reading his post. To accuse one of lying is crude. I will niether read nor post here again
Last Edited : Saturday, 9 April 2011 - 11:41 | Hwatta Joined 11/11/2003 Posts : 1661
| Posted : Saturday, 9 April 2011 - 15:44 I guess that is sort of a solution. If you trust the other players not to take advantage and kill off all of your black troops for points, you could all just quit. Or you could quit in 3, 2, 1 order to be sure the rankings won't change. Last Edited : Saturday, 9 April 2011 - 15:45 | sugarleo Joined 4/05/2002 Posts : 3773
| Posted : Sunday, 10 April 2011 - 07:26 Yes, Hwatta....that 'could' have been an option if trust had not been killed between us (since it now appears that another change from previous versions is that one can quit and still maintain their ranking now). ________________________________
Message From : Zandorr View Messages Sent : Thursday, April 07, 2011 - 13:36 Campaign_20611 (me)>>>> I'll msg Henry to make sure and vote again...I'll also click it again myself.....I WILL NOT ATTACK...PLEASE honor the same....until we can figure this out....if we can't vote to end the game, then let's hold for a couple turns and then we'll resume a fight.... Your Message I will leave all units where they are I will not attack or move until after you ________________________________
As the return response to my message shows, a statement was made and then broken...there's no reference to 'keep' attacking...and even if, he DID 'keep' attacking...so, of course, with what I had left, I started attacking back with my greatly diminished troops after his 'free shot'...
So, in summary, appears we have a 'broken' quit game option.
EDIT: One additional comment, we've all heard the statement (after some action was taken)..."I didn't read your 'post/msg' until AFTER.."...I moved/attacked or whatever the case may be.....I recommend that all players make a habit of checking your messages BEFORE you take in-game actions. It's an easy excuse to use when you make a statement as this.....so read your messages prior....then no mistakes will be made...unintentional or otherwise. Last Edited : Sunday, 10 April 2011 - 07:36 | Juxtaposer Joined 27/11/2002 Posts : 355
| Posted : Monday, 11 April 2011 - 01:36 It should be well understood that developing trust is very important in this game. Earning respect is what will be accomplished. |
| | | | |