HOME   |   COMMUNITY   |   TRAINING   |   BATTLES   |   DUELS   |   CAMPAIGNS   |   HELP      
Click above links for MAIN menus, mouse-over for sub-menus.24 NOV 2024 15:31  
ShoutBox
PLEASE VOTE at
MPOGD & TWG

WoL Membership

SiteMap



free counters

W
A
R
O
N
L
I
N
E
:

M
E
S
S
A
G
E

B
O
A
R
D

R
E
P
L
I
E
S
Who's Online : 1 (3)
Active : 11 (11)

refresh
Back To Suggestion Box   |   Return To Forums
Forum : Suggestion Box
AuthorTopic : Barracks range
Crimsondawn
Joined 12/06/2007
Posts : 1240

Posted : Sunday, 13 December 2009 - 00:11

I think that all range bonus should be abolished exept for towers and outposts. towers have just been replaced by barracks when it comes to seiging and i think it almost defeats the purpose of keeping seige units out of towers to begin with.

Hambone
Joined 27/12/2008
Posts : 329

Posted : Sunday, 13 December 2009 - 12:27

Not really - barracks are too expensive to build just to get a point extra range, and it balances the catapult's offensive danger somewhat - you can station catapults in your barracks and use it to defend against other catapults very successfully.

For 7500 gold, you ought to get a bonus like this to help you protect the investment.

Lothar
Joined 2/08/2009
Posts : 433

Posted : Sunday, 13 December 2009 - 19:35

I would have to agree. I haven't seen too many people building a barracks for seige. In fact they normally build futher back for fear of losing them.

Heat
Joined 16/10/2007
Posts : 690

Posted : Monday, 14 December 2009 - 07:09

The pirate Crimsondawn, does not fear anything

Princess in the Shadows
Joined 14/11/2008
Posts : 510

Posted : Monday, 14 December 2009 - 08:02

I dont see a problem with barracks with a 1+ for cats as its always a risk to loose that 7.5k and your cats.
If you are willing to take the gamble close up, good on you if you get away with your opponents inexperience....it will be a valuble lesson for him/her

Back To Suggestion Box   |   Return To Forums


WarOnline.Net is © Copyright 2000-2024 by Requiem. All rights reserved. [ 0.175781 seconds ] Privacy   |   Terms   |   Links   |   Stats   |   SiteMap