my opinion on this is put on hold right now but i would like to know, when you make a nap with someone do you feel that it is wrong to feed people information that might hinder the person you have a nap with? IE: you find yourself in a nap with someone who is gaining power way too fast and will hinder your efforts to eliminate other players and take resources of your own. Seeing this you let others know where his forces are and where they are advancing and/or allow aggressors to pass through your territory in order to attack the person you already had the nap with. I am just wondering what everyones thoughts are on this. I didn't find anything wrong with using this kind of strategy but have since noticed that other players refuse to do it themselves.

A NAP is an agreement and therefore has to have all its eventualities discussed. If you didn't discuss and agree, then it is outside the NAP.

Of course, anyone is free to make and break NAP's at will, just don't expect hearty agreements with that person if you screw them over for expediency's sake. Shifty dealing is paid for in like coin, I think.

Last Edited : Saturday, 20 June 2009 - 21:56

Mog abuses naps to recover energy during the day... oh wait... wrong kind of nap

What is the forum's consensus on giving notice to end a NAP?

For instance, you give notice at 7:30 am on turn 50. You've agreed to give 5 turns notice.
What's the earliest time it considered "honourable" to commence hostilities?
00:01am on turn 55? or 7:31am.
Or 18:00 on turn 54?

For me I always give 10 turns warning so if it was at 730 on turn 50 ,I always send a message stating AT turn 60 we will be at war this does not mean at 730 on turn 60 ...it means what it says,if they responded with 730 on turn 60 I would just have a laugh to myself (but agree) and attack at 730 on turn 60 to the second lol

Well on a 10 turn notice NAP, a few hours is neither here nor there, if you can't organize your defence in 9 turns you're going to have trouble no matter what.

On a shorter notice period, those hours could make a difference between getting 4-6 moves in (e.g. 5 turns notice served at 23:59 on turn 50, attack commences 00:01 on 55, means you only have a chance at 4 turns moves from notice served to first hostilities), while you opponent gets 6 moves, more than enough to close in from outside outpost range with a pre-prepared army.

I also have a condition with all my naps that on breaking the nap(10 turns notice) all troops must be removed from eachothers lands a quickly as possible and not to return until the 10 turns has elapsed.

Wait...let me get this straight...I say I'm not gonna attack you for 20 turns, and you actually BELIEVE me???

Ok..ok...just gotta get my breath back, I think I JUST LAUGHED ONE OF MY LUNGS UP!!!

Now I know not to make any agreements with Tub....*Princess writes that into her black book.

little balck book? what does it say about Zues?

yes Zues is in my little black book aswell and it says ........sorry I cant tell you accept that it gets edited regularly and always when I cant sleep in the wee hours

she has me listed in alphabetical order under "F"

thats right...F for Fonzarelli!
AYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

the wee hours of the morning are the best ones. especially when you can go back to sleep

Fonzarelli?
Now im really confused.

Och, just kill him anyway Princess!!