Last Edited : Tuesday, 4 November 2008 - 13:41 |
Renno Joined 23/05/2005 Posts : 1582
| Posted : Tuesday, 4 November 2008 - 19:49 new troop type; Harem
special abilities; to incapacitate all soldiers and make them drop their weapons as well as their jaw, soldiers next to a harem would become so enamoured they won''t be able to defend themselves. However ratios must work 1/1 so if you have a stack of 6 harem girls only 6 soldiers of the stack it is next to would become defenseless, if it is a stack of 10 the other 4 would still fight.
A harem of course would have no attack abilities, but they could seduce an enemy unit to cross over to your side, unless the enemy stack is bigger than the harem stack.
oh they must be dressed in see through lace.
|
|
darkguy00000 Joined 11/04/2006 Posts : 1009
| Posted : Tuesday, 4 November 2008 - 23:19 Canadian wisdom indeed. Why isn't this in the game?! |
|
RUFF RYDER Joined 5/08/2008 Posts : 315
| Posted : Friday, 21 November 2008 - 14:52 well i think you guys must think there is'nt enough advance stuff on the game already well as for the bribe units i think it is stupid because when have you's seen a soldier get bribe into a nother side only in movies not in real life so to me you guys have been watching to much tv lol |
|
A-Dude Joined 25/03/2004 Posts : 152
| Posted : Friday, 21 November 2008 - 16:46 umm i'm sure there have been a few troops in Medieval times that took bribes to turn to the enemy's side so i doubt its just "only in movies not in real life"..and i'm not advocating bribe units btw.. |
|
Hankyspanky Joined 3/07/2004 Posts : 1602
| Posted : Saturday, 22 November 2008 - 11:50 Yes the Irish did in Braveheart! still it is again a change that is benificial for the defender, and defending has already become so much easier! |
|
pinafore Joined 19/07/2001 Posts : 2307
| Posted : Saturday, 22 November 2008 - 15:42 perhaps a counter-tech like intelligence service...? |
|
darkguy00000 Joined 11/04/2006 Posts : 1009
| Posted : Saturday, 22 November 2008 - 15:47 I agree with hanky that attacking is already at least twice as hard now as it was pre-October changes. We don't need to make it harder now again. |
|
RUFF RYDER Joined 5/08/2008 Posts : 315
| Posted : Thursday, 27 November 2008 - 05:02 well i still wreckon there is still people on this game that are still getting use to the new system now |
|
BloodBaron666 Joined 1/04/2003 Posts : 686
| Posted : Thursday, 27 November 2008 - 20:04 Attacking's not hard, so long as you have mounds a 6 balista and your opponent has 2! |
|
Crimsondawn Joined 12/06/2007 Posts : 1240
| Posted : Tuesday, 2 December 2008 - 19:23 i think this could be a really interesting addition to the game but maby have a new class that is immune to this or maby if a commandeer is within 3 square the unit cann't be turned, maby give this ability to a knight or hc as well. |
|
RUFF RYDER Joined 5/08/2008 Posts : 315
| Posted : Saturday, 6 December 2008 - 04:43 well how about this one if a player goes inactive then you can use a commander to bribe enemys units to become your troops i think that would be good |
|
A-Dude Joined 25/03/2004 Posts : 152
| Posted : Saturday, 6 December 2008 - 06:49 maybe..or why even use bribes?maybe have the comm take them over like buildings?just a thought |
|
RUFF RYDER Joined 5/08/2008 Posts : 315
| Posted : Monday, 15 December 2008 - 04:17 yea i reckon that would be better then just going to a enemy unit and just pushing your mouse button and getting a enemy unit to join your army because if you do it the way the other people have said to do it in this topic it would be unfair with the player thats got that enemy unit because what happen if that person got lets say 5 stacks of 10pop marksmen and you end up taking the lot and then you will have the advantage if you are at war with that person thats what i think anyway bro's |
|
A-Dude Joined 25/03/2004 Posts : 152
| Posted : Monday, 15 December 2008 - 06:19 i forgot to say that it should probably cost the same amount of gold that it costs to make the unit so for example it would cost 2000 to take an enemy scout...and that the other player should probably get the gold just to even things out |
|
pinafore Joined 19/07/2001 Posts : 2307
| Posted : Tuesday, 16 December 2008 - 05:57 would be a bad bribe if it would cost the same ammount. as i mentioned before it should cost less. perhaps 50%-75% of the unit costs. and there should be a 50% chance that the bribe wont work. if it works, the gold/tribute/whatever is spent to bribe the unit and should not go to the other player. if your bribe fails, the gold/tribute/whatever should go the the other player.
i also think that bribiung should be random and done without a special unit. we just need a bribe button and a menu to select the ammount of gold/tribute/whatever we want to spend. the more we spend, the better the unit we can bribe. example: if we spend 1000-1500 we could bribe scouts. if we spend 10000-15000 we could bribe marksmen.
we could also spend more gold/tribute/whatever to boost chances of a successful bribe. could be useful if you are low on points and high on tribute.
my 2 cents Last Edited : Tuesday, 16 December 2008 - 05:59
| |