If we had three categories of player-rolls like:
a) superhuman
b) human
c) subhuman,

each player could join one of the categories and actually be listed as such so that players could have a better idea as to the type of play to expect from individuals in a game.

That way if a player doesn't play by the character standards of the category, he could be voted out of it and into a more appropriate category.

PS:
I leave it to the players to determine the actual character standards for each category like for example:
a) a superhuman doesn't ever break a Nap
b) a human might break a Nap due to unethical play
c) a sub-human cannot ever be trusted to honor a Nap

For myself I would choose *"human"* because I would give warning that I intend to break a Nap if I have napped for example with a player who is participating in a gang-attack on another player.
We have discussed the circumstance before and only one other person agreed that it was just cause to break a Nap for the aforementioned reason (i.e. keeping the Nap under all circumstances was given priority by some folks who would probably consider themselves to be *"superhuman"*.

rex

Last Edited : Friday, 1 August 2008 - 08:10

not what I thought the thread was about but maybe......

I would like to see a cross between camps and clan games where we can get a group of players together and team up into 2 (or maybe 3) teams to be assigned by the computer, say when you sign up or so.

Both ideas are not good.Trust me.